Opes Financial

The four SMSF lenders still active in this market.

A practitioner’s guide to La Trobe Financial, Mortgage Ezy, Pepper Money, and Granite Home Loans. LVR caps, liquidity tests, fund balance minimums, and where each lender suits a file.

Close-up of a heavy steel vault door slightly ajar at dusk with the brass dial and locking handle in sharp focus.

A smaller market than it used to be.

The big four banks left SMSF lending across 2018 and 2019. ME Bank and a few mid-tier lenders followed. The market is now served by specialist non-bank lenders who have built SMSF policy from the ground up. Four of them sit on the Opes panel through Outsource Financial.

Lender choice is not the start of an SMSF property file. It is the end. The fund structure, the strategy, and the property come first. The lender is matched to the picture once that picture is clear. The SMSF property investment guide works through that sequence in long form, and the connection to retirement planning is where the strategy usually starts.

Side by side

The four lenders we write to, in detail.

Indicative policy. The numbers shift, sometimes monthly. Treat this as a guide, not a quote.

Specialist lender

La Trobe Financial

Long-established in the SMSF lending market. A reliable first port of call where the file fits standard policy and the property is straightforward.

Appetite
Residential and commercial
LVR residential
Up to ~80%
LVR commercial
Up to ~70%
Liquidity test
Post-settlement buffer required, typically 10% of loan
Minimum balance
From around $200k starting fund balance
Specialist lender

Mortgage Ezy

Competitive on rate for residential SMSF. Useful where liquidity is tight or the fund balance is on the leaner side. Worth comparing against La Trobe for fit.

Appetite
Mainly residential
LVR residential
Up to ~80%
LVR commercial
Limited
Liquidity test
Lighter liquidity requirement on some products
Minimum balance
Flexible depending on overall position
Specialist lender

Pepper Money

Flexible servicing assessment. Helpful where contribution patterns are unusual, where there are multiple members, or where standard credit policy does not quite fit the file.

Appetite
Residential
LVR residential
Up to ~80%
LVR commercial
Case by case
Liquidity test
Assessed alongside servicing
Minimum balance
Considered with the overall fund picture
Specialist lender

Granite Home Loans

SMSF specialist. Considered when the file calls for a more particular policy read, or when the property type sits between standard lender categories.

Appetite
SMSF-focused
LVR residential
Up to ~75%
LVR commercial
Up to ~70%
Liquidity test
Standard SMSF policy buffer
Minimum balance
Reviewed at file level

All figures are indicative and subject to lender credit policy at the time of application. The shortlist for your fund comes with reasoning, not just a name.

How the shortlist is built.

Three to four lenders are shortlisted per file. Rate is one input. Policy fit is the bigger one.

  1. 01
    Fund picture first

    Balance, members, contribution pattern, liquidity, deed terms. The lender choice comes from these inputs, not the other way around.

  2. 02
    Property fit

    Residential or commercial. Single dwelling or strata. Metro or regional. Each lender treats these differently.

  3. 03
    Servicing assessment

    Rental income, member contributions, existing fund cashflow. How each lender will assess these is not uniform.

  4. 04
    Policy edge cases

    Multiple members, related-party leases (commercial only), recent contribution caps used. Not all lenders price these the same way.

  5. 05
    Final shortlist with reasoning

    Three to four lenders, with the trade-offs spelled out. You sign off on the choice before we submit.

Who is writing this comparison.

Practitioner
Balki Balakrishnan
Experience
12+ years across advice and lending
Advice authorisation (AFSL)
AR 409415 of La Verne Capital Pty Ltd
Credit authorisation (ACL)
CR 45250 of Outsource Financial Pty Ltd
Track record
30+ SMSF loan clients written
Memberships
FAAA, FBAA

This page is general information, not personal advice. The right lender for your fund depends on personal circumstances. See the Financial Services Guide and the Credit Guide for the full scope.

SMSF lender questions we get most.

Westpac, CBA, NAB, and ANZ exited or scaled back SMSF lending across 2018 to 2019, citing complexity and risk. The market is now served by specialist non-bank lenders. The four below are the ones most active in residential and commercial SMSF lending today.

Headline rate is one part of it. The bigger differences sit in LVR caps, the liquidity buffer required post-settlement, fund balance minimums, treatment of contribution income, and appetite for the property type. A file that gets a clean run at La Trobe might need a Pepper-style assessment, or vice versa.

Most of the SMSF lending market is residential. Commercial SMSF lending is narrower. La Trobe and Granite are the two we go to most for commercial business real property purchases. LVRs run lower than residential, generally 65 to 70 per cent.

Not always. With SMSF lending, the policy fit usually matters more than the rate. A file that needs a manual review or a deposit waiver might be better placed with a lender that is harder on rate but softer on policy. The shortlist comes with the reasoning.

Yes. If you have a relationship with a lender outside the panel and they have an SMSF product, we can review it. The point is to get the file to settlement on terms that suit the fund, not to push a particular lender.

Because the lender choice is part of the strategy, not separate from it. LVR drives contribution planning. Repayment frequency drives cashflow inside the fund. The advice and the loan are different pieces of the same conversation. Opes does both.

Want a shortlist for your fund?

A 30-minute call to read the file. Lender shortlist follows the strategy, not the other way around.